Today, just a simple link to an article you’ll find interesting — or find yourself not that.
As in: this here piece.
Uhhh okai then: The point of the matter is that here, we still have that idealistic vision in which AI would augment us, improve us, near-eugenetically though with prostheses, leaving so-hard-they-become-easy-by-not-being-recognized choices of the Hobson kind for the ones with least ethical scrupules, the early adoptors to collateral on the others. Early adoptors through the need for compensation of already lacking (basic…) capabilities…
Before becoming too negative, this:
[Think, self-rule, et al.; Dunedin again]