Disruption, -parity

Just wondering: How’s the disruption in your ICT coming along ..?

Seriously; hardly at all ..!?

Join the club. Of almost all. Public, private, large, small; all organisations suffer your fate of [barely; outdated browser] being able to read all about the Great New stuff that’s out there, but seeing nothing of it in your daily work. Strange, eh?
Or is it again the short-term impact being overestimated until it’s “too” “late” to join in, for most orgs ..? Because the real talent, the people that actually want something out of life either with, through your org or without it, elsewhere, will have gone to that elsewhere with all their motivation, and you’re left with the dull, exhausted, numbed-by-the-avalanche-of-downsizing-rounds petrified staff [you deserve, if you don’t pay attention]?

So, be positive; hunt for the opportunities and push your people to do the same! While also bulldozering through the roadblocks, often (middle? elsewhere too?) management having been trained to the hilt with objection finding, -raising stamina to defend the stasis quo [intended]. Close the gap, from veering into nothingness off the path of innovators, to return to lead at the head.

Oh well; for now:
DSC_1026
[Needs serious renewal above the shoulders; DC]

Nice note

Just a long-form quote this time, by Norm Laudermilch:

In addition, we should stop using the term “advanced threat” to describe the threats we see every day. It’s too common to hear a recently breached company point to a “very sophisticated cyber attack perpetrated by a nation-state”, which makes it sound like this was something undetectable and impossible to stop. Gartner analyst Neil MacDonald calls this the “dog ate my homework” excuse. More likely we find that it was just another piece of malware cranked out by one of the latest exploit toolkits, delivered via spear-phishing or targeted malvertising, perpetrated not by highly advanced nation-state adversaries but by comparatively low-tech cyber crime gangs. Even if a nation-state attacker crafts an extraordinarily unique and complex malware payload, they’re probably using the common delivery vectors mentioned above. Why? Because these attacks work every time.

Emphasis mine and I second. Until quantumcrypto is cracked, each, any and all cracks are of sophistication Zero. Or One, at most. Combining the most basic of ‘attacks’ i.e. exploits of negligence. Read the full article, and agree. Oh, and [self-plug] there could be side benefits in sloppiness, like this – IF deployed properly. And have your press release at hand, like this one.

So, …
DSC_1024
[Surpreme court; would you want your ball there?]

To model, shuffle back and forth

Now that the Jobless Growth meme has lost steam (though possibly not fertility, yet), it is useful to have a look at its in some way I don’t completely see how counter-part, antidote. Quod non. Where the analogy breaks down.
What I mean to say is; when Big Corp / Gov’t exists less than before, after the shake-out-by-the-numbers-by-lack-of-management-capabilities-to-raise-revenue waves of the past decade+ [don’t start me on the utter non-distinction between ‘governance’ and management ..!] every last grain of growth or even innovation capacity has been thouroughly bleached out of said sad organisations. And still there’s Growth. Which is a. a ridiculous but very, very dangerous financial bubble, b. non-existent as for work being performed, productivity being delivered, c. both.

No, all the start-ups that you hear about, are money- and certainly productivity pits.

Or, as noted before on this blog, there’s many jobs unregistered as such, in the independent consultancy sphere. [Typo resulted in con-slut-ancy; apt. May be one myself, soon.] Which may correct the numbers, but doesn’t diminish the fear behind, embedded within, the remarks about the joblessness and how jobs are important for the moral structure of societies. Yes, what would jobless growth for a great many years on end already have meant for the moral/ethical structure of US society ..?

But let’s turn now to the core message of today’s post: There’s hope, suddenly, that structures emerge in which a more egalitarian (as for power differentials) labour market may re-emerge. On the one extreme, there’s Uber et al with their The Algorithm Rules Over Minion Slave Single Menial Job-Contractors model, and on the other, the classical Let’s Keep All Minions On Contract Lest They Badmouth Us And Run with the last snippets of intellectual capital we might have (left). Caps off, begun to be too much.
Two extremes. Now, some middle ground starts to emerge. I mean, there was already some ‘flexible shell’ of independent contractors for odd jobs, temp projects etc., be it with smaller out/in-sourcing companies – but that was only a halfway solution with a core that in fear of death hung on to their increasingly irrelevant little corner and the increasing army of zombies floating around from too short stint to too short stint to pay the mortgage (or barely so) – and don’t start on Mechanical Turk etc., as so summarily and thouroughly dismissed by Jaron Lanier et al. But with Instacart on the move, there is a shift from the other side; much needed and welcomed, through which the ideal of a flexible life for workers comes into view before the horizon, suddenly seems realisable.

Yes, it may regard not-too-highly-paid jobs initially; the workers are still ‘lowly’ (?) manual labourers in this case. But the idea that it may be worthwhile for organisations to have a (larger) pool of flexible part-time workers, with their independence at scheduling and all, is New and should be recognised and celebrated the world over.

Well… Certainly I would like the idea to spread fast, very fast – as in: the next two months – to here the Netherlands… Work 3 days a week, and paid-hobby for the other two (?); I’d very much like that thank you indeed.

But … your thoughts ..? And this:
DSCN0750
[Lobster doesn’t know. Barça]

As predicted; a next container move

Actually, the speed of development of this, is bigger than it seems. Both on the impact and on the implementation side. It’s just that it’s out of sight for most.

Any suggestions how this impacts Security ..?

For now:
DSCN5522
[Next time we’ll take fresh pics; DC]

Trigger seeding

In defense of sloppy account management …
Sort of. Rather, deliberately sloppy account management.

Reading through this in particular, and that, I wondered: Would there not be a nice part of a solution in seeding your user accounts database(s) with fake accounts, to act as tripwires ..? They could be given no access to anything, or access only to honeypot-like info / environments. And then trigger the alarm when accessed – by intruders, or by own security staff or auditors when doing surveillance of controls functioning.
Somehow also, I have a gut feeling there’s some hidden secondary effects in this. Any of you who has given this some more thought already, and have info on this ..? Much appreciated.

For now, this:
DSCN1106
[This makes me look fat. La Défense again.]

Off Maps

Again an intermission. About interruption. Of interesting innovation(s).

Jsut to put it down like that; we tend to see only the successes – of the time being. But the once were warriors of disruption aren’t all, around, anymore. Be ware the next hypes…

[Edited to add: This here pic via Martin de Bie may be a first thing attempting to challenge little G’s hype cycle visual since that got traction, to depict innovation-to-disruption-scale developments. Other than the above list, returning to the underlying ideas not accidental Inc’s.]

DSCN0657
[Good Barça. Not a hotel.]

Where accountancy will go

Considering the progress made in the accountancy sector with ‘continuous’ assurance, it struck me that until now, process (read: mere procedures) was driven by technology, at least up till now. Because the idea of ‘transactions’ in that, now quickly antiquating, ERP system we all know, was based like it was and is in all the other comparable systems or less, on the ideas before that. And procedures just had to adapt to the software. No, not the other way around; that’s pure marketing babble!
So, now we (hopefully soon) have XML and XBRL to take some work off our hands (?). But also … qua big d analysis (tired of writing / pronouncing that at full length..!) we’re moving ahead. To be able, would be able, to just dump all ‘transactions’ or primitives into a big db and then run ad hoc queries on them, possibly with some AI in the mix. Who needs separate bookkeepers’ accounts when all source data is available in blobs or whatever ..?

Which may require a leapfrog of assurance. But hey, the world wasn’t invented to service that, but the other way around.
Any thoughts ..?

Thought so. hence:
20150510_160828_HDR
[Oh, the Great Outdoors! … Central Park, NY, NY]

Fun / stagnation

About the difference between boring and Inspirational! in business.

Old New
Process, procedures, work steps Request for direction
Compliance Demonstrating failure; to learn
Punishment for (anyone’s! esp. higher-ups’) failures Coaching towards more errors
Stepping out of line (even by casual remarks hinting at less than 100% drone motivation) is failure Pivoting (even for your contribution) is near-mandatory
Succes is obedience to the gallows Success is coming up with / doing the hitherto infeasible, unthinkable
The ones exploiting drones (licking up / kicking down) and (only) best versed at sticking to their chair, are promoted Promotion? We don’t do rank and file here; we like your creative more or less
You’re fired – just because you’re a number that turned up in the lottery – that’s held every couple of months because bosses are bored and utterly incapable of coming up with anything revenue-increasing i.s.o. cutting costs and shrinking is growing, right? Even when the shrinking cuts out exactly the very growth-enhancing competences you need ever more desparate. You’re allowed to pursue a career elsewhere, too but we don’t want to lose you. What can we do to make you like it even more here?
“(The ‘innovator’s dilemma’ is that ‘doing the right thing is the wrong thing.’) As Christensen saw it, the problem was the velocity of history, and it wasn’t so much a problem as a missed opportunity, like a plane that takes off without you, except that you didn’t even know there was a plane, and had wandered onto the airfield, which you thought was a meadow, and the plane ran you over during takeoff.” (as here; very instructive) The same.
Fade to grey “I’m Cool”

Some solution to your (future) joblessness

You may have noticed I tended towards the dystopian side regarding Singularity things and by-definition jobless growth (or slowdown, or anything), as in this and the posts linked therein.
Possibly, you’re in the category aiming for:
Photo10-4
[Wingspread house; good living by FLlW at Racine, WI]

I didn’t discuss time frames.
Though I’m not optimistic about those, either.
But at least, there’s some info that may lull the frightened back into sleep, and help the agile, willing, wanting, forward:
CGGf6YgWAAAetje
[Plucked from … some socmed post]

Study … and keep in mind: This is for the very (happy) few that have a big head start; are at a quite stellar developmental level already.

Ah, your home controlled by …?

In the race to grasp as much of the market as possible, which is understandable, one party jumps in to create the API of APIs we’ve all been waiting for, among others (since this) in this domotics category.
But … will we surrender even our in-house as-yet unconnected lifeblogging data to one of the parties that don’t have the best of track records re privacy …? I mean this one. With an odd name

Oh yes, I hear you suppress your fears … with empty words, given that even at chip level intrusion and (data) extrusion seems to have been possible, and in the wild, already for years.
So, this one party grabbing your data at software level may even be an ‘improvement’ for transparency … the devil you know (but still don’t see) – how’zat for self-censorship in your house? Even when with a required warrant, will (tending to casual, ubiquitous) surveillance in your own home be the future?

Well, I’ll go cleaning up. With said product (name) of course…. And:
DSCN1283
[Preferably, the non-scratching kind … London already a decade ago]

Maverisk / Étoiles du Nord