Innovation advisory and IRM/InfoSec/I-Audit services. Positive contrarian, inspirator, loosen-upper.
Quoting before-last week’s post, alreay an update’let: ] [Sigh] couldn’t resist the introvert-dad’s joke in title. On the verge of the last Q of ’19 so you have a little spare time to prep; this, about the really really Big Things that will capture the news next year: Genetic algorithms (like here), maybe outright towards … Continue reading “[20/20 update]”
[Sigh] couldn’t resist the introvert-dad’s joke in title. On the verge of the last Q of ’19 so you have a little spare time to prep; this, about the really really Big Things that will capture the news next year: Genetic algorithms (like here), maybe outright towards solving hard problems that ML-training offers no convergence … Continue reading “The 20/20 on Next Year’s Big Things”
Funny, isn’t it? Not only do we see lots of articles about OT popping up on our socials’ timelines, but also item for the management of data. Quite similar. ‘OT’ being among other things debunked for not being but a sub-branch of T (as is ‘traditional’ ‘IT’) – indeed, which was first ..? Which was … Continue reading “Data-lake driven AI Is A Mirage, still, after decades”
Once again, about how the legal approach to GDPR ‘compliance’ did not work quite as intended. How long until this is rightfully concluded to be the wrong way per se for the subject ..? For any subject ..? Yes, some branch of the Big 3½ (them again) had used a wrong grounds for processing, and … Continue reading “Legalistic GDPR – a liability”
By and large, the world is slowing down a bit [sic] already again towards the Summer lull. Which gives us plenty of time to get rid of old habits. And of misconceptions. The famous pyramids are one (huh) of them, definitely. Compare the standard picture you’ve all become accustomed to, to ‘For instance, he wrote … Continue reading “Correcting the pyramids”
Just for the record; you noticed how things are heating up regarding the ePrivacy Directive forthcoming ..? No wonder. Where GDPR was just a consolidation of existing rules and regulations and shouldn’t have had too much impact anywhere apart from the SOx-style totalitarian bureaucratic paperwork requirements (or you had a backlog on perfectly reasonable information … Continue reading “ePriv heating up”
Maverisk is beschikbaar voor interim-werk (3 tot 9 maanden, 16-32u.p.wk.), consultancy (doorlopende begeleiding en ondersteuning bij het doorvoeren van verbeteringen in de organisatie), of specifieke opdrachten, van het adviserende of onderzoekende soort. Een opdracht aan Maverisk is maatwerk – hoewel u voor consultancy ook een variant van een standaardpakket kunt gaan. Daarvoor kunt u kiezen … Continue reading “Pakket / maatwerk”
Bij de verjaardag van een kennis, actief en succesvol wijkagent, kwam het volgende naar boven. Ter discussie … De wijkagent surveilleert én is er voor vragen uit de buurt. Met een licht surveille-regime; de agent is maar in z’n eentje in een best grote wijk en wandelt wat. Waar z/hij in de buurt is, wordt … Continue reading “Een rondje met de cyberwijk-agent”
Tsja, sommigen zijn héél druk met Avg- of GDPR-implementaties (zoals hier). Al die DPIAs (huh, meervoud ..?), die zelden überhaupt nodig zijn (zie onderaan pagina 4 van deze screenprint)… En alles voor de papieren tijger. Jawel. En ‘we’ pakken het helemaal verkeerd aan. Al lijkt het hele circus op een (verlaat!) Y2k- oftewel Millennium-gebeuren, het … Continue reading “Toen Y2k een ding was – ‘klinkt-als’ Avg nu, voor consultants ..? You wish.”
You get that. Since Verify → ¬Trust. When you verify, you engender the loss of trust. And since Trust is a two-way street (either both sides trust each other, or one will loose initial trust and both will end up in distrust), verification leads to distrust all around – linked to individualism and experience [we’re … Continue reading “Trust ⊻ Verify”