Compliance Reading Short List (security, privacy, accountancy)

Just a shortie again, for the weekend when you want to come back to being on top of things, things being the behavioural aspects of compliance. As too many of us don’t seem to be well-connected enough in the Thinking that goes in in compliance-science circles. Yes there is such a thing. Yes I know … Continue reading “Compliance Reading Short List (security, privacy, accountancy)”

Orgs don’t give a hoot about security [or privacy, or (ops) risk management]

Case in point: Have you ever seen a job (opening) profile for a ‘first line’ position where awareness and active promotion towards staff of information security and privacy, was listed at all ..? Now there’s two Buts [with not two but (sic) one T] you will inevitably come back to me with and I’m not … Continue reading “Orgs don’t give a hoot about security [or privacy, or (ops) risk management]”

Privacy statement

Het waarborgen van de privacy van bezoekers van de websites van Maverisk is een belangrijke specialisatie van en voor ons. Daarom beschrijven we in ons privacy statement welke informatie we verzamelen, hoe we deze informatie gebruiken en wat uw rechten zijn. Doel Maverisk vraagt en gebruikt uw gegevens alleen voor doeleinden waarvoor u ze verstrekt … Continue reading “Privacy statement”

Privacy statement

Het waarborgen van de privacy van bezoekers van de websites van Étoiles du Nord is een belangrijke specialisatie van en voor ons. Daarom beschrijven we in ons privacy statement welke informatie we verzamelen, hoe we deze informatie gebruiken en wat uw rechten zijn. Doel Étoiles du Nord vraagt en gebruikt uw gegevens alleen voor doeleinden … Continue reading “Privacy statement”

Not sure … about the mix of AI, privacy values, ethics, BD

Recently, I was informed about this. With the blueish table spraking a recall (the way the brain does) of this and in particular, this [downloadable here]. This, the latter in particular, being about how ‘privacy’ as an issue(s), depends on its definitions – both formally, and emotionally. I   s u g g e s t   y o u   s t u d y   i t   f u l l   d e t a i l  yes that’s a lot of   but definitely … Continue reading “Not sure … about the mix of AI, privacy values, ethics, BD”

The privacy-nightmare not your pseudo-dreams

Again, some serious flaw in the GDPR: Its reliance on, sponsorship for, pseudonymisation. Which is worthless, already against break-ins. And is worse, much worse, when you consider all the exemptions for ‘statistical use’ that are a cover for all the blatant abuse of personal data that the GDPR was originally intended to counter. And is … Continue readingThe privacy-nightmare not your pseudo-dreams”

Common(s) as privacy and vice versa ..?

Remember from your econ class that concept of The Commons, and how problematic it was? Is? There was this intriguing post recently, on how Free Speech might be considered and deliberated in terms of the commons being exhausted by undue over-use (abuse) — for its use alone ( → ). Leading to aversity of the … Continue readingCommon(s) as privacy and vice versa ..?”

Emerging degrees of privacy

Given that ‘privacy’ is a property that emerges from good Security, more particularly from Confidentiality (and Integrity), there’s two avenues to succeed in this field: If quick and maybe even too dirty: Data minimalisation (as e.g., here, in Dutch) Else (OR?): Fine-grained protection, also against the default Read all down the stack (user / end … Continue reading “Emerging degrees of privacy”

Privacy for drones, *from

Some found it odd that e.g., in Chicago, the ground floor space, the up into the air (no not that) building, and the naming rights to that building, are traded separately. Elsewhere, one’s home comes with an expectance of Privacy, “behind one’s front door”. But not outside; that’s free game for any … usually still … Continue reading “Privacy for drones, *from”

Maverisk / Étoiles du Nord