Author: Maverisk

WIoTables

Am I too late with this post, or are people still mixing up the Internet of Things and Wearables ..?

First, a picture:
DSCN0468a
[Rarely seen Cala, at ON]

Because we’re talking quite distinct things. Yes, there’s a crossover area where e.g., the sensors or ‘reflectors’ we wear, operate in the IoT realm of ambient intelligence.

But for starters, there’s wearables. Mostly, human-to-Matrix sensors / Matrix-to-human feedback interfaces. Hooking you up in a blue pill world. Oh yes so helpful; often providing morsels of value like Likes through displaying to all out there, mostly to trolls, your (under)achievements. Or calling attention to your slacking; business can’t wait! (You’re not essential though, by the way, easily dumped by the wayside if some human or not algorithm plays it that way).

And there’s the IoT, sensors, networks, actuators, and Central Scrutinisers (1979 mind you!!) that form the Matrix itself. Out of control, soon to be out of control of any human or (alternatively) TLA. Soon to be run by its transient Singularity.

Now, don’t make that error again!

Ah. AI, here it is.

I wondered before on what the … Google would be up to in terms of Artificial Intelligence. Here‘s some news on that.
Some. As I believe this is only a side show to throw us off.
Surely, there must be much, much, much more in the pipeline…

Anyhow, here’s:
DSCN1157
[The view that’s offered. Fakely transparent. London UK, indeed.]

Not news, still suppressed?

Why is it that this paper on chip-and-pin fraud hasn’t gained much more attention in the Netherlands ..!?

Maybe because NL has only just sort-of completely switched off the magstripe to EMV.
Which even before its comprehensive roll-out here in NL, was known to be weak. Years before. And still no-one took action.

A picture for your efforts. But (payment) industry, you fail with a big F again…
MEDIUM09
[London temp, also years back]

Cybersecurity, yeah!

This is how you do it:
20140610_124346
[As spotted in Voorburg. No, not ‘shopped a single bit.]

Yes, indeed, this is how your ‘cybersecurity’ (#ditchcyber ! #wegmetcyber !) compares to the real deal. But hey, if you want to believe you’re up there with the Big Boys, go ahead. I won’t stop you from your own make-believe. At kindergarten.

Seth and you

Seth Godin posted this little piece on the outliers among us. Or even – outsiders.

The real question now is: What is it that you are the innovator in ..? If you can’t think of anything, think harder. If still, you may be the deadwood, the replaceable, superfluous non-individual. Consuming resource, hence on balance non-efficient existence to be erased.
But I bet you can find something …!?

And a piece of beauty:
dudokhsumlinkshuge
[Hilversum. Ergo, Dudok.]

CIAAEE+P

Privacy came to the fore last week, at a very interesting ISSA NL event.
Where we discussed the prevalent Confidentiality-Integrity-Availability approach (where impacts mandatorily regard the data subject(s), not you the processor, as the data subjects are legally owner of their info …!) and whether those three actually cover privacy aspects sufficiently.

Well, we did conclude that for now, CIA is ‘still’ the common denominator. But … hey, Auditability might be added, as that’s a sort-of requirement throughout privacy protection. And Effectiveness and Efficiency – of the data handling! – have a place as well, being representative of proportionality and legal-grounds-for-the-privacysensitive-data-handling-in-the-first-place (i.e., real purpose / purpose limitation!); if you collect more than very, very strictly necessary, you’re culpably inefficient in a hard legal sense, and at least part of your data handling is not effective.

But should we add Privacy as yet another factor ..? Does it have value in itself? Initially, I thought so, as the common CIA somewhere will always have lost its connection to information value, e.g., through the Bow Tie effect and other deviations (lagging) from modern developments.

Which I’ll discuss below. But now, first, an intermission picture:
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
[Yup, Whistler]

So, as said, Privacy may be covered by CIA. But, … with specific deviations of interpretation. Continue reading “CIAAEE+P”

Maverisk / Étoiles du Nord